This article from Gizmodo reports on research done over at Mozilla. Newer cars – the ones that connect to the internet and have lots of cameras – are privacy disasters. Here’s a paragraph to give you a sense of the epic scope of the disaster:
“The worst offender was Nissan, Mozilla said. The carmaker’s privacy policy suggests the manufacturer collects information including sexual activity, health diagnosis data, and genetic data, though there’s no details about how exactly that data is gathered. Nissan reserves the right to share and sell “preferences, characteristics, psychological trends, predispositions, behavior, attitudes, intelligence, abilities, and aptitudes” to data brokers, law enforcement, and other third parties.”
Nissan’s response tells you everything that’s wrong with current privacy legislation:
““When we do collect or share personal data, we comply with all applicable laws and provide the utmost transparency,” said Lloryn Love-Carter, a Nissan spokesperson. “Nissan’s Privacy Policy incorporates a broad definition of Personal Information and Sensitive Personal Information, as expressly listed in the growing patchwork of evolving state privacy laws, and is inclusive of types of data it may receive through incidental means.””
Let’s translate. Nissan is probably compliant. Also, privacy compliance is a joke. Also, compliance apparently only requires that you receive NOTICE that they take your data AND CONSENT to that policy, probably merely by driving the vehicle. Also, they probably reserve the right to change their privacy policies unilaterally, at will. Also, they almost certainly do not let you opt-out of any of it while CONSENTING by driving the car. It’s a very special kind of “contract” and “consent.” Also, how do they know about your sex life? Also, even if you have sex in the car, there is basically no answer to that question that is not beyond creepy!
As you may have guessed, NOTICE AND CONSENT is an utter sham and has been for a while. The gizmodo article spells out some of the particular absurdities here – for example, you may not want to ride in one of these cars either, as passengers are “users” deemed to have CONSENTED to the privacy policy. Your driver should probably provide you NOTICE beforehand! “A number of car brands say it’s the driver’s responsibility to let passengers know about their car’s privacy policies—as if the privacy policies are comprehensible to drivers in the first place.” No wonder folks are cynical and resigned about corporate privacy – they’re manipulated into it by corporations. Also, they’re confused, frustrated and angry about the fact they don’t actually get to consent.
This is the best example I’ve seen of all that in a while, and a crystal-clear indicator of why we need not just new privacy legislation (we do!) but a new direction (more real regulation, less soft compliance and "notice and consent" fig-leaves).
PS – not picking only on Nissan:
“Other brands didn’t fare much better. Volkswagen, for example, collects your driving behaviors such as your seatbelt and braking habits and pairs that with details such as age and gender for targeted advertising. Kia’s privacy policy reserves the right to monitor your “sex life,” and Mercedes-Benz ships cars with TikTok pre-installed on the infotainment system, an app that has its own thicket of privacy problems.”
Recent Comments