Our friends at Retraction Watch ask: should scientific papers that are known to be very wrong (and that continue to be cited) be retracted?
My view is that evidence of “hurry and hubris” should stay on the books. What do you think?
« please let's not do a victory dance | Main | Russian Orthodox Collusion with Putin Regime... »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341ef41d53ef017742c42914970d
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Should Linus Pauling’s erroneous 1953 model of DNA be retracted?:
Recent Comments